After Keefer's 1st 450 shootout day they seem to think the RMZ rear shock is ok per his podcast.

Myke
Posts
2457
Joined
9/28/2009
Location
San Diego, CA US
Fantasy
2883rd
Still finished last but the rear shock wasn't it's worst part that put it there. 3 hours long but he gives a good summary in the first 20 minutes.

Looks like Honda's stock is going up this year!

https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/keefer-tested/e/51524198?autoplay=true
|
9/19/2017 1:31pm
Interestingly put by Keefer, he said Suzuki took a sideways step this year rather than one step forward.
Motofinne
Posts
10686
Joined
1/4/2014
Location
FI
9/19/2017 1:33pm
I like the concept of doing these interviews after each day!

It will be interesting if the riders feel the same about the shock on the other tracks. The guys that did the Vital shootout did not like it.
flatout111
Posts
2689
Joined
10/17/2015
Location
Raleigh, NC US
9/19/2017 1:41pm
Great podcast, Keefer. Loved all 3 hours of it! Super informative.
ML512
Posts
15458
Joined
12/28/2008
Location
Wildomar, CA US
Fantasy
45th
9/19/2017 1:47pm
Motofinne wrote:
I like the concept of doing these interviews after each day! It will be interesting if the riders feel the same about the shock on the...
I like the concept of doing these interviews after each day!

It will be interesting if the riders feel the same about the shock on the other tracks. The guys that did the Vital shootout did not like it.
I think Keefer's is great, we chatted for 30 mins this morning and plan on doing a podcast together in a week or so.

The Shop

ML512
Posts
15458
Joined
12/28/2008
Location
Wildomar, CA US
Fantasy
45th
9/19/2017 1:53pm
Interestingly enough, I got a call yesterday morning from our Suzuki rep as they were just getting started at DirtBike's Shootout. I went over our comments for about 20 mins with him and we'll be working with Suzuki on some further testing here soon. I got a text at the end of day stating they actually used our feedback towards some of the changes throughout the day for DirtBike's group and it helped.
9/19/2017 1:53pm Edited Date/Time 9/19/2017 1:56pm
Still day 1...see what happens after 2 more test days. Johnson said track was probably "too smooth" to really test suspension, just a lot of small chop.

Interesting all the different opinions on KTM/Husky/Yamaha. Definitely an acquired taste.

Also everyone saying the RMZ engine is "meh" and the "too smooth" comment, yet still has plenty of power. Hits too high of RPMs without letting you know.
ML512
Posts
15458
Joined
12/28/2008
Location
Wildomar, CA US
Fantasy
45th
9/19/2017 1:57pm
Still day 1...see what happens after 2 more test days. Johnson said track was probably "too smooth" to really test suspension, just a lot of small...
Still day 1...see what happens after 2 more test days. Johnson said track was probably "too smooth" to really test suspension, just a lot of small chop.

Interesting all the different opinions on KTM/Husky/Yamaha. Definitely an acquired taste.

Also everyone saying the RMZ engine is "meh" and the "too smooth" comment, yet still has plenty of power. Hits too high of RPMs without letting you know.
Similar to what our guy's said about the engine. As most would argue on here, 450s make enough power...but there are 450s that make more power and yet are more usable. Put it bluntly, the RM-Z makes enough, but many of the other bikes make more and it's usable...not needed all the time, but handy when you want it.
MXVet261
Posts
711
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Valley City, OH US
Fantasy
4061st
9/19/2017 1:57pm Edited Date/Time 9/19/2017 1:59pm
The RMZ shock will be fine. People that don't like it will have plenty of options to have them revalved/etc just like in the past.

I've bought bikes before that I almost couldn't ride them stock the suspension was so bad. Have a reputable tuner work on it and voila it's good.

I would much rather deal with the new technology shock on the RMZ than the TAC air forks of the past few years (on the Kaw too).

If the RMZ came with air forks still it would be 100% off my list of consideration.
Huckster
Posts
2572
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Woodstock , NY US
9/19/2017 1:58pm
Anyone check the guy that wanted to shoot ML512's buddy for Ranking the Husky 6th? He may be off the deep end if he listened to that Pod!
ML512
Posts
15458
Joined
12/28/2008
Location
Wildomar, CA US
Fantasy
45th
9/19/2017 2:02pm
MXVet261 wrote:
The RMZ shock will be fine. People that don't like it will have plenty of options to have them revalved/etc just like in the past. I've...
The RMZ shock will be fine. People that don't like it will have plenty of options to have them revalved/etc just like in the past.

I've bought bikes before that I almost couldn't ride them stock the suspension was so bad. Have a reputable tuner work on it and voila it's good.

I would much rather deal with the new technology shock on the RMZ than the TAC air forks of the past few years (on the Kaw too).

If the RMZ came with air forks still it would be 100% off my list of consideration.
Very true in that sense. The cool part about this shock is it can sorta be converted to a more traditional design if needed or can be modified as is. The new forks are worth their weight in their gold coated upper tubes...compared to the TAC.
gpracer36
Posts
419
Joined
12/8/2011
Location
El Cajon, CA US
9/19/2017 2:40pm
I think its cool ML lets guys break down another sites shootout. Thanks
9/19/2017 2:40pm
After coming off a 14 yz450 to a rmz450, the less power makes an out of shape guy go faster and more laps. The extra heft is not noticable on the track. The turning on the suzuki is second to none. Also the little less hp makes it so much easier to have fun.
ML512
Posts
15458
Joined
12/28/2008
Location
Wildomar, CA US
Fantasy
45th
9/19/2017 2:43pm
gpracer36 wrote:
I think its cool ML lets guys break down another sites shootout. Thanks
A Shootout is just opinion and I love discussing testing itself...that's why me and Keefer were talking about doing a podcast about it. No one is right or wrong if they give their honest opinion. Ultimately we do Shootouts to give the end reader more info about the bikes they're looking at buying.
752dad
Posts
601
Joined
11/24/2014
Location
Hartland, MI US
9/19/2017 3:17pm
I apologize in advance ML, my mom was an English teacher, it's Keefer and I.

KC
IceMan446
Posts
4671
Joined
1/10/2010
Location
Sacramento, CA US
9/19/2017 3:35pm
Glad to hear the same complaints about the AER forks that I have been having.

Will be interesting to see what they did to change some of that and what Keefer recommends.
ML512
Posts
15458
Joined
12/28/2008
Location
Wildomar, CA US
Fantasy
45th
9/19/2017 3:36pm
752dad wrote:
I apologize in advance ML, my mom was an English teacher, it's Keefer and I.

KC
That it is, and I deserve that correction.
jtiger12
Posts
1720
Joined
8/2/2006
Location
Forest H Ill, MD US
9/19/2017 3:43pm
Kind of surprising how all over the board these rankings are..
ob
Posts
1624
Joined
3/14/2010
Location
Carlsbad, CA US
9/19/2017 3:46pm
It was just one day at one track, who knows how the opinions will change after a couple days on the bikes.
9/19/2017 3:55pm
gpracer36 wrote:
I think its cool ML lets guys break down another sites shootout. Thanks
ML512 wrote:
A Shootout is just opinion and I love discussing testing itself...that's why me and Keefer were talking about doing a podcast about it. No one is...
A Shootout is just opinion and I love discussing testing itself...that's why me and Keefer were talking about doing a podcast about it. No one is right or wrong if they give their honest opinion. Ultimately we do Shootouts to give the end reader more info about the bikes they're looking at buying.
ML
Your last sentence is the most important thing to consider. People need to implant that sentence in their heads when reading a shootout.
Myke
Posts
2457
Joined
9/28/2009
Location
San Diego, CA US
Fantasy
2883rd
9/19/2017 4:14pm
ob wrote:
It was just one day at one track, who knows how the opinions will change after a couple days on the bikes.
Agreed. The Suzuki rear shock opinion may drop down once they start hitting bumps with it.
ML512
Posts
15458
Joined
12/28/2008
Location
Wildomar, CA US
Fantasy
45th
9/19/2017 4:14pm
ML
Your last sentence is the most important thing to consider. People need to implant that sentence in their heads when reading a shootout.
I'm thinking that sentence needs to go in the Shootout...about 500 times.
racinstation
Posts
807
Joined
5/18/2013
Location
Driggs, ID US
Fantasy
1921st
9/19/2017 4:19pm
The Keefer comments were more along the lines of what I saw on the 2018 RMZ. I felt the shock was good, forks were great. The motor is smooth and needs some hit to add excitement. I think it has been the same story for years and years. Buy the one you like and tailor it to your style and preference and you will be just fine.
kkawboy14
Posts
11494
Joined
6/5/2015
Location
TX US
9/19/2017 4:26pm
ML512 wrote:
Interestingly enough, I got a call yesterday morning from our Suzuki rep as they were just getting started at DirtBike's Shootout. I went over our comments...
Interestingly enough, I got a call yesterday morning from our Suzuki rep as they were just getting started at DirtBike's Shootout. I went over our comments for about 20 mins with him and we'll be working with Suzuki on some further testing here soon. I got a text at the end of day stating they actually used our feedback towards some of the changes throughout the day for DirtBike's group and it helped.
Why did he say it is so heavy?
tempura
Posts
2079
Joined
5/18/2015
Location
JP
9/19/2017 4:29pm
I suspected the new RMZ Shock needed more testing on the production model.
ML512
Posts
15458
Joined
12/28/2008
Location
Wildomar, CA US
Fantasy
45th
9/19/2017 4:30pm
kkawboy14 wrote:
Why did he say it is so heavy?
He didn't have a reason, he's not an engineer or part of the design team...

We didn't talk that much about weight, mostly shock comments and what notes I had from the guys.

But simply, they haven't redesigned their engine in over ten years, there's the first place to look for weight...
kkawboy14
Posts
11494
Joined
6/5/2015
Location
TX US
9/19/2017 4:31pm
kkawboy14 wrote:
Why did he say it is so heavy?
ML512 wrote:
He didn't have a reason, he's not an engineer or part of the design team... We didn't talk that much about weight, mostly shock comments and...
He didn't have a reason, he's not an engineer or part of the design team...

We didn't talk that much about weight, mostly shock comments and what notes I had from the guys.

But simply, they haven't redesigned their engine in over ten years, there's the first place to look for weight...
Makes sense!
smoothies862
Posts
3210
Joined
3/18/2014
Location
OH US
Fantasy
676th
9/19/2017 4:38pm
752dad wrote:
I apologize in advance ML, my mom was an English teacher, it's Keefer and I.

KC
Should not that be, we apologize in advance." We" being you and your condescending ego. Tongue
kwenske321
Posts
373
Joined
11/8/2011
Location
Houston, TX US
9/19/2017 4:54pm
kkawboy14 wrote:
Why did he say it is so heavy?
ML512 wrote:
He didn't have a reason, he's not an engineer or part of the design team... We didn't talk that much about weight, mostly shock comments and...
He didn't have a reason, he's not an engineer or part of the design team...

We didn't talk that much about weight, mostly shock comments and what notes I had from the guys.

But simply, they haven't redesigned their engine in over ten years, there's the first place to look for weight...
Yo ML,

Keeper mentioned the RMZ will likely have e-start next year, and that manufacturers are likely testing the 2019 models presently. Do you foresee Suzuki dropping a entirely new motor in this chassis in the next 2 years?
racer495a
Posts
206
Joined
4/25/2008
Location
CO US
9/19/2017 4:59pm
kkawboy14 wrote:
Why did he say it is so heavy?
ML512 wrote:
He didn't have a reason, he's not an engineer or part of the design team... We didn't talk that much about weight, mostly shock comments and...
He didn't have a reason, he's not an engineer or part of the design team...

We didn't talk that much about weight, mostly shock comments and what notes I had from the guys.

But simply, they haven't redesigned their engine in over ten years, there's the first place to look for weight...
kwenske321 wrote:
Yo ML, Keeper mentioned the RMZ will likely have e-start next year, and that manufacturers are likely testing the 2019 models presently. Do you foresee Suzuki...
Yo ML,

Keeper mentioned the RMZ will likely have e-start next year, and that manufacturers are likely testing the 2019 models presently. Do you foresee Suzuki dropping a entirely new motor in this chassis in the next 2 years?
Hopefully, it has to be 8-10lbs heavier than the ktm engine. Would be cool to see just the engine weights. Yamaha really shoots up in weight 250-450 where ktm is just a few lbs so that tells the story where most of the weight is.
CarlinoJoeVideo
Posts
7358
Joined
11/30/2013
Location
Portland/Los Angeles, CA US
Fantasy
2339th
9/19/2017 5:01pm
Interestingly put by Keefer, he said Suzuki took a sideways step this year rather than one step forward.
But if you listen to the RMZ450 podcast that he did before the shootout he said the RMZ was a better bike than the 17.

Post a reply to: After Keefer's 1st 450 shootout day they seem to think the RMZ rear shock is ok per his podcast.

The Latest